Supreme Court allows appeal regarding scope of Art. 23 § 1 KP when employer changes activity type after asset acquisition.

The Supreme Court partially quashed the lower court's judgment regarding the scope of application of Article 23 § 1 of the Labour Code. The plaintiff argued that the new employer's activity differed from the previous one, while the lower court incorrectly assumed continuity based solely on the acquired assets. The court ruled that the legal scope depends on the new employer's chosen activity, not merely the nature of the acquired assets, thus remanding the case to determine the specific employment relationship timeline.