Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III ZP 52/97 AI generated

Third fixed-term contract after two prior ones creates indefinite term effect under Art. 25 1 KP.

Case Number III ZP 52/97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether a third fixed-term contract automatically converts to an indefinite-term relationship. The court held that such a conversion occurs if two prior fixed-term contracts were concluded starting from the law's effective date of June 2, 1996. The decision prioritizes legal stability and avoids disrupting the established practice of counting contracts from the new statutory date.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 25 1 KP; A third successive fixed-term employment contract is legally equivalent to an indefinite-term contract if the two preceding fixed-term contracts were concluded beginning from the entry into force of this provision.

Keywords

AI generated
fixed-term employment contracts indefinite-term conversion Labor Code Article 25 1 successive employment agreements transitional period interpretation labor law stability statutory effective date

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 25 1 KP

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text