II UKN 183/97
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where lawyer's non-notification did not affect outcome as client waived presence.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Jerzy C. against a labor accident compensation decision. The appellant's lawyer argued that failing to notify him of the hearing date deprived him of defense rights, yet the client had requested the trial proceed in his absence. The court ruled that since the client waived his presence and the expert opinion was favorable, the procedural error had no impact on the final result.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 379 pkt 5 KPC; Art. 393 1 pkt 1 KPC: Failure to notify a representative of a hearing date does not deprive a party of defense rights if the party requested the trial proceed in their absence and the error did not affect the outcome.
Keywords
AI generated
cassation appeal dismissal
procedural error impact
waiver of presence
labor accident compensation
expert opinion relevance
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 379 pkt 5 KPC
Art. 393 1 pkt 1 KPC
Art. 393 8 KPC
Art. 6 ustawa z dnia 12 czerwca 1975 r. o świadczeniach z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych
§ 3 pkt 2 rozporządzenia Ministra Pracy, Płac i Spraw Socjalnych z dnia 17 października 1975 r.
Cited Case Law
AI generatedII UKN 183/94