Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 183/97 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal where lawyer's non-notification did not affect outcome as client waived presence.

Case Number II UKN 183/97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Jerzy C. against a labor accident compensation decision. The appellant's lawyer argued that failing to notify him of the hearing date deprived him of defense rights, yet the client had requested the trial proceed in his absence. The court ruled that since the client waived his presence and the expert opinion was favorable, the procedural error had no impact on the final result.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 379 pkt 5 KPC; Art. 393 1 pkt 1 KPC: Failure to notify a representative of a hearing date does not deprive a party of defense rights if the party requested the trial proceed in their absence and the error did not affect the outcome.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal dismissal procedural error impact waiver of presence labor accident compensation expert opinion relevance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 379 pkt 5 KPC
Art. 393 1 pkt 1 KPC
Art. 393 8 KPC
Art. 6 ustawa z dnia 12 czerwca 1975 r. o świadczeniach z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych
§ 3 pkt 2 rozporządzenia Ministra Pracy, Płac i Spraw Socjalnych z dnia 17 października 1975 r.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
II UKN 183/94

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text