Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 51/96 AI generated

Polish Supreme Court dismisses appeal in social benefit case where disputed value is under 5,000 zlotys. The appeal is inadmissible due to the low monetary value of the claim. The court rules that the appeal is procedurally barred because the financial stake does not meet the statutory threshold for civil appeals.

Case Number II UKN 51/96
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland rejected the cassation appeal filed by Piotr K. against a social security decision regarding disability pension classification. The applicant argued for a higher disability group and salary recalculation, claiming procedural errors in expert evaluations and missing accounting testimony. The court dismissed the appeal as inadmissible because the monetary value of the disputed claim was below the 5,000 zloty threshold required for civil appeals under the Civil Procedure Code.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 393 § 1 pkt 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego; Art. 393 § 5 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego: In social benefit cases, a cassation appeal is inadmissible if the value of the subject matter is less than five thousand zlotys, regardless of the applicant's claim for higher benefits.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal inadmissibility social benefit value threshold disability pension classification civil procedure code monetary value limitation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 393 § 1 pkt 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
art. 393 § 5 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
art. 393 § 8 § 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
art. 22 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text