Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PRN 92/96 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses extraordinary review regarding fixed-term teacher employment during school restructuring.

Case Number I PRN 92/96
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review filed by the trade union against a lower court ruling that upheld a fixed-term employment contract for a teacher. The court found that the school's need to replace an absent biology teacher justified the contract under the Teacher's Card Act, despite the plaintiff's argument that full-time work requirements were not met. The decision emphasized that the school was in an organizational phase where full-time positions did not exist, making the temporary contract legally sound.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 10 ust. 2 pkt 2-4; Art. 10 ust. 3 i 4 Karty Nauczyciela: Zatrudnienie nauczyciela na umowę o pracę na czas określony jest dopuszczalne, gdy uzasadnione jest to potrzebą zastępstwa nieobecnego nauczyciela, nawet jeśli warunki pełnego etatu nie są spełnione w momencie zawarcia umowy.

Keywords

AI generated
Karta Nauczyciela umowa na czas określony zastępstwo nauczyciela Sąd Najwyższy rewizja nadzwyczajna organizacja nauczania stosunek pracy

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 10 ust. 2 pkt 2-4 ustawy z dnia 26 stycznia 1982 r. - Karta Nauczyciela
art. 10 ust. 3 i 4 Karty Nauczyciela
art. 421 § 1 KPC
art. 11 ust. 5 ustawy z dnia 1 marca 1996 r.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text