II UR 5/96
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses legal review request as the issue lies outside the factual scope of the case.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the legal review request because the contested legal issue did not fall within the factual scope of the case. The applicant sought revaluation of her pension based on a constitutional ruling, while the Social Insurance Institution argued the relevant law had already lost effect. The Court held that since the lower court only granted the right to revaluation without calculating the amount or interest, the matter required factual reconsideration rather than legal review.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 391 KPC; Art. 388 KPC; Art. 477 § 1 KPC: The Supreme Court cannot substantively review legal issues that do not fit within the factual scope of the case.
Keywords
AI generated
legal review request
factual scope limitation
pension revaluation
Supreme Court jurisdiction
procedural dismissal
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 391 KPC
Art. 388 KPC
Art. 477 § 1 KPC
Art. 477 § 2 KPC
Art. 38 ust. 2 ustawy o organizacji i finansowaniu ubezpieczeń społecznych
Cited Case Law
AI generatedI PZP 120/94