Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 25654/2026 — snpen AI generated

Cassation appeal dismissed for generic legal violation claims lacking specific argumentative refutation of lower court reasoning.

Case Number Ordinanza — n. 25654/2026 — snpen
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Italy (IT)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Cassation declared the cassation appeal filed by Tamym Hamid inadmissible due to generic legal violation and motivation defects. The defense failed to refute the specific argumentative path traced by the appellate court in confirming the first-instance conviction. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, and the appellant was ordered to pay procedural costs and a fine to the State.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 367, comma 1, n. 1 c.p.p.; Art. 367, comma 1, n. 2 c.p.p.: A cassation appeal based on generic allegations of legal violation or defective motivation is inadmissible if the appellant fails to provide specific arguments refuting the reasoning of the lower court.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal inadmissibility generic legal violation claim defective motivation defect failure to refute reasoning procedural costs award

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 367, comma 1, n. 1 c.p.p.
Art. 367, comma 1, n. 2 c.p.p.
AI generated
Ordinanza — n. 30408/2021 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed for inadmissibility due to lack of specificity and impermissible factual re-evaluation.
Ordinanza — n. 6750/2022 — snpen
Cassation appeals against plea bargain sentences dismissed for inadmissible grounds of reasoning and excessive penalty.
Ordinanza — n. 38974/2024 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal as inadmissible due to lack of specific grounds and repetition of arguments.
Ordinanza — n. 23483/2023 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeals against conviction for aggravated robbery and assault due to generic and untimely grievances.
Ordinanza — n. 2268/2024 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed for lack of specific grounds regarding evidence evaluation and factual reconstruction.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

posto da: TAMYM HAMID nato il 01/10/1991avverso la sentenza del 24/11/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di VENEZIA dato avviso alle parti; udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere VITTORIO PAZIENZA;RITENUTO IN FATTO E

CONSIDERATO IN DIRITTO

Rilevato che TAMYM Hamid (CUI 03GYB3N) - imputato del reato di cui all'art. 349, secondo comma, cod. pen. - ha proposto ricorso per cassazione avverso la sentenza del 24/11/2025, con cui la Corte d'Appello di Venezia ha confermato la sentenza di condanna in primo grado emessa dal Tribunale di Verona; rilevato che la difesa ha dedotto violazione di legge e vizio di motivazione in termini del tutto generici, privi di qualsiasi confutazione del percorso argomentativo diffusamente tracciato dalla Corte territoriale; ritenuto pertanto che il ricorso debba essere dichiarato inammissibile, con conseguente condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di Euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle mmende P.Q.MVittor azienza Andrea Gentili,-, A‘A/ucts DEPOSITATA IN CANCELLERIA Sezione VI! Penale 09 LUG 026 L'ASSISTENTE,,( ‘ 1 DIZIARIO Dott.ssa Ka eniente