Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 24566/2026 — snpen AI generated

Cassation court dismisses appeal as motive is merely reiterative and seeks inadmissible factual reconstruction.

Case Number Ordinanza — n. 24566/2026 — snpen
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Italy (IT)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible and ordered the appellant to pay procedural costs. The sole ground of appeal was deemed merely reiterative and improperly sought a factual reconstruction using evaluation criteria different from those applied by the lower court. The court ruled that the lower court's decision was legally sound and free from the alleged defects, thus rejecting the request for a new factual assessment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 366 c.p.p.; Art. 367 c.p.p.: An appeal to the Court of Cassation is inadmissible if the sole ground is merely reiterative or if it attempts to obtain an inadmissible reconstruction of facts through evaluation criteria different from those adopted by the territorial court.

Keywords

AI generated
merely reiterative appeal inadmissible factual reconstruction Court of Cassation procedural costs legal certainty

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 366 c.p.p.
Art. 367 c.p.p.
AI generated
Ordinanza — n. 34903/2025 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed for inadmissibility as it improperly challenges factual findings under Italian law.
Ordinanza — n. 26991/2025 — snciv
Cassation court dismisses appeal where appellate court correctly applied Art. 907 c.c. on view rights over Art. 112 of municipal regulations.
Ordinanza — n. 24936/2024 — snciv
Cassation court orders reduction in pristino for building overhangs violating legal distances between properties.
Ordinanza — n. 28583/2023 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal for lack of motivation, ruling dissent on merits exceeds procedural limits.
Ordinanza — n. 12264/2023 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal against conviction for counterfeiting an international driving license photo.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

da: RAIANO EMANUELA nato a NAPOLI il 06/10/1993 avverso la sentenza del 02/07/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di ROMA dato avviso alle parti; udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere MICHELE CALVISI;RITENUTO IN FATTO E

CONSIDERATO IN DIRITTO

Letto il ricorso di Emanuela Raiano; considerato che l'unico motivo di ricorso risulta meramente reiterativo e, per altro verso, non è formulato in termini consentiti dalla legge in sede di legittimità perché risulta finalizzato ad ottenere una inammissibile ricostruzione dei fatti mediante criteri di valutazione diversi da quelli adottati dalla Corte territoriale che, con motivazione esente dal vizio dedotto, ha esplicitato congruamente le ragioni del proprio convincimento facendo applicazione di corretti argomenti giuridici ai fini della dichiarazione di responsabilità e della sussistenza del reato; rilevato, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile con condanna della ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremil