Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 21819/2026 — snpen AI generated

Cassation court dismisses appeal for generic mitigating circumstances as already rejected by lower court.

Case Number Ordinanza — n. 21819/2026 — snpen
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Italy (IT)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible because the sole ground complained of was a generic mitigating circumstance previously rejected by the Court of Appeal. The appellant, Losavio Annarita, reiterated the same factual grievances without presenting new elements or legal arguments. The court ruled that since the lower court's decision was immune from criticism, the appeal lacked merit and was therefore dismissed with costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 cod. pen.; Art. 366 c.p.p.: An appeal is inadmissible if it merely reiterates grounds already examined and correctly rejected by the court of appeal without new elements or legal arguments.

Keywords

AI generated
generic mitigating circumstances inadmissible appeal reiteration of grounds immunity from criticism procedural dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 cod. pen.
40343/2025 Losavio OSSERVA Visti gli atti e la sentenza impugnata (condanna per il reato di cui all'art. 385 cod.
Art. 366 c.p.p.
art. 385 cod. pen
40343/2025 Losavio OSSERVA Visti gli atti e la sentenza impugnata (condanna per il reato di cui all'art. 385 cod.
AI generated
Ordinanza — n. 9310/2025 — snpen
Italian Supreme Court dismisses appeal against second-instance judgment for lack of new arguments and invalid mitigation claim.
Ordinanza — n. 421/2025 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal as inadmissible due to repetitive arguments already rejected in lower court judgment.
Ordinanza — n. 18973/2024 — snpen
Italian Supreme Court dismisses appeal for generic mitigating circumstances as inadmissible due to lack of specific criticism.
Ordinanza — n. 45610/2022 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal on criminal liability and sentencing, citing procedural inadmissibility and lack of merit.
Ordinanza — n. 10754/2026 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal for inadmissibility due to lack of specific argumentation and improper timing.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

posto da: LOSAVIO ANNARITA nato a BARI il 08/12/1983 avverso la sentenza del 23/01/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di BARI dato avviso alle parti; udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere MARIA SILVIA GIORGI;R.G. 40343/2025 Losavio OSSERVA Visti gli atti e la sentenza impugnata (condanna per il reato di cui all'art. 385 cod. pen.); Esaminato il motivo di ricorso; Ritenuto che l'unico motivo di ricorso, che lamenta la mancata concessione delle circostanze attenuanti generiche, si limita a reiterare, con doglianze versate in fatto, identico motivo di gravame già sottoposto al vaglio della Corte d'appello e correttamente disatteso con motivazione immune da censure (pag. 3 della sentenza impugnata); Rilevato, pertanto, che il ricorso debba essere dichiarato inammissibile, con la condanna della ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. P. Q. M. D P.Q.MIl Consigliere estensore Il Presi nteMaria Silvia Gíorgi Angelo stanzo DE IN 2026 11 Fumti,o _Jack) 2