Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 21561/2026 — snpen AI generated

Cassation court dismisses appeal against second-instance judgment regarding inadmissibility of the cause and procedural costs.

Case Number Ordinanza — n. 21561/2026 — snpen
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Italy (IT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Cassation dismissed the appeal filed by Davide Pirrotta against the Palermo Court of Appeal's judgment of May 9, 2025. The lower court had declared the cause inadmissible and ordered the appellant to pay procedural costs and fines. The court upheld this decision, confirming that the appellant's arguments regarding the inadmissibility of the cause were rejected by the second instance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 360 c.p.p.; Art. 361 c.p.p.: The Court of Cassation dismisses appeals against judgments that correctly apply the law to reject the cause as inadmissible and order the payment of procedural costs.

Keywords

AI generated
inadmissibility of cause procedural costs Court of Cassation appeal dismissal second instance judgment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 360 c.p.p.
Art. 361 c.p.p.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Corte cost. n. 186
moC: C)5; me ere cne lo stesso abbia proposto il ricorso se cie-2lia causa di inammissibiiità (Corte cost. n. 186 Lcw-sc e condanriai ricorrente ai pagamento dehe spese process ,....H.--' • H '3 •:-.;C:Th e LH.° tre L':1!o oeoom clelía Cassa deHe ammende.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

posto da: PIRROTTA DAVIDE nato a PALERMO il 18/11/1975 avverso la sentenza del 09/05/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di PALERMO dato avviso alle parti; udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere DEBORA TRIPICCIONE;di Pirrotta Davide avverso ;a sentenza in epigr.a ,ifroLignatc; Lit:eH-iiih.) che i: , i.-u-ir-;-;;-n ,-,,,•si;.);le perché deduce due moti\» merarnente riprodutt. ;.--.;;•-o;r:;;i ensuu..i ; d; r.7..,...-.pcm3. 2.Thilità e al diniego deHa causa di non punib;;;'......• .vagHati e disattesi con corretti amm , :voe pagme2,3e4: c±ie, o O. . o d ricorso consegue la condanna del ricorrei -,té deHe sp e della somma di euro trema da versare ;1 -1 favore .a. moC: C)5; me ere cne lo stesso abbia proposto il ricorso se cie-2lia causa di inammissibiiità (Corte cost. n. 186 Lcw-sc e condanriai ricorrente ai pagamento dehe spese process ,....H.--' • H '3 •:-.;C:Th e LH.° tre L':1!o oeoom clelía Cassa deHe ammende. Pres Angelo fotanzc r DfpoSn"ATA CAV