Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 20034/2026 — snpen AI generated

Criminal appeal dismissed because defendant ritually waived the appeal and reasons were generic.

Case Number Ordinanza — n. 20034/2026 — snpen
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Italy (IT)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible because the defendant ritually waived the right to appeal. The appellant, Vittorio Celentano, sought to challenge a second-instance judgment from Ancona, but the court noted the absolute genericity of the grounds provided. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal without examining the merits, citing the procedural waiver and lack of specific arguments.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 616 cod. proc. pen.; Art. 616, comma 1, lett. a) cod. proc. pen.: A criminal appeal is inadmissible if the appellant ritually waives the right to appeal or if the grounds of appeal are absolutely generic and do not specify the points of law or fact to be examined.

Keywords

AI generated
ritual waiver of appeal generic grounds of appeal inadmissibility of appeal Criminal Procedure Code procedural waiver Corte di Cassazione second instance judgment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 616 cod. proc. pen.
art. 616 cod. proc. pen
AI generated
Ordinanza — n. 13595/2023 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed due to withdrawal; defendant ordered to pay court costs and fines.
Decreto — n. 21642/2023 — snciv
Cassation court dismisses appeal declaring civil suit extinguished by plaintiff's formal waiver of proceedings.
Ordinanza — n. 48598/2023 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses criminal appeal as withdrawn by defendant, ordering payment of court costs and fines.
Sentenza — n. 34792/2021 — snciv
Cassation appeal dismissed as withdrawn; unilateral withdrawal without notice causes loss of interest but not extinction.
Decreto — n. 3391/2024 — snciv
Italian Supreme Court dismisses appeal due to formal withdrawal of the lawsuit by the deceased appellant's heirs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

RIO nato a NAPOLI il 11/04/1984 avverso la sentenza del 15/05/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di ANCONA dato avviso alle parti; udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere BENEDETTO PATERNO' RADDUSA;letto il ricorso proposto nell'interesse di Vittorio Celentano avverso la sentenza in epigrafe; esaminati gli atti e il provvedimento impugnato; ritenuto che il ricorso è inammissibile perché l'imputato ha ritualmente rinunziato al ricorso; rilevato che all'inammissibilità del ricorso conseguono comunque le pronunce di cui all'art. 616 cod. proc. pen. vieppiù considerando la assoluta genericità delle ragioni di impugnazione P.Q.M