Cassation court dismisses appeal against detention regime extension due to insufficient evidence of criminal organization ties.

The Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible, rejecting the defense's claim that the lower court's reasoning was merely apparent. The defense argued that the extension relied solely on the defendant's criminal biography without proving probable connections to the criminal organization. The court held that such connections need only be reasonably probable based on acquired data, which the lower court sufficiently demonstrated through the defendant's high-level role and lack of behavioral change.