Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 18470/2026 — snpen AI generated

Cassation court dismisses appeal as generic and unfounded regarding theft by snatching conviction.

Case Number Ordinanza — n. 18470/2026 — snpen
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Italy (IT)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Cassation declared the appeal against the second-instance judgment inadmissible, ruling it generic and manifestly unfounded. The lower court had confirmed a conviction for theft by snatching, noting the victim could not oppose the specific conduct used. Consequently, the appellant was ordered to pay procedural costs and a fine.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 367 c.p.p.; Art. 368 c.p.p.: An appeal is inadmissible if it is generic and manifestly unfounded, particularly when the appellate court has already precisely outlined the reasons for the conviction.

Keywords

AI generated
generic appeal manifestly unfounded theft by snatching inadmissible appeal procedural costs

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 367 c.p.p.
Art. 368 c.p.p.
AI generated
Ordinanza — n. 34447/2021 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed for inadmissibility due to factual complaints and sentencing determinations outside the scope of legal review.
Ordinanza — n. 9037/2025 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal on robbery conviction, rejecting arguments on theft with snatching and witness credibility.
Ordinanza — n. 4249/2025 — snpen
Italian Supreme Court dismisses appeal contesting factual reconstruction and legal qualification of robbery charge.
Ordinanza — n. 27347/2022 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal as inadmissible due to generic grounds not meeting Article 448 c.p.p. requirements.
Ordinanza — n. 47664/2022 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal on robbery conviction due to insufficient evidence of attempted robbery.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

nato a GENOVA il 09/08/1974 avverso la sentenza del 05/06/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di BARI dato avviso alle parti; udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere RICCARDO NERUCCI;N

RITENUTO IN FATTO

E IN DIRITTO Rilevato che Sergio Lorusso ricorre avverso la sentenza emessa dalla Corte di appello di Bari, che ha confermato la sentenza di condanna pronunciata in primo grado per il reato di furto con strappo; ritenuto che il ricorso sia inammissibile in quanto generico e manifestamente infondato, avendo la Corte d'Appello dato conto con precisione delle ragioni per cui il furto si è consumato tramite una condotta di strappo cui la persona offesa non è stata in grado di opporsi; rilevato, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile, con la condanna del ricor-rente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di tremila euro in favore della Cassa delle ammende.

P.Q.M.

Dic