Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 18262/2026 — snpen AI generated

Cassation court dismisses appeal as generic and lacks specific facts regarding liability.

Case Number Ordinanza — n. 18262/2026 — snpen
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Italy (IT)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Corte di Cassazione declared the appeal inadmissible due to its generic nature and lack of specific factual allegations. The appellant, Caradonna Antonio, challenged a second-instance conviction for the crime under Article 337 of the Penal Code without providing concrete details on liability. The court rejected the claim because the arguments failed to meet the threshold of specificity required for admissibility.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 337 c.p.; Art. 360, n. 1, lett. a) c.p.p.: An appeal is inadmissible if the grounds are entirely generic and fail to deduce any specific facts or arguments necessary to challenge the judgment.

Keywords

AI generated
generic appeal inadmissibility Article 337 c.p. lack of facts second instance conviction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 337 c.p.
Art. 360, n. 1, lett. a) c.p.p.
art. 337 c.p
AI generated
Ordinanza — n. 30412/2021 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal for resistance to public official due to lack of specificity and inadmissibility.
Ordinanza — n. 13957/2023 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed for generic grounds regarding resistance crime and generic mitigating circumstances.
Ordinanza — n. 42335/2021 — snpen
Italian Supreme Court dismisses appeal on excessive penalty grounds as it exceeds admissibility limits.
Ordinanza — n. 23342/2024 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal as mere complaints lacking legal basis regarding sentencing and omitted reasoning.
Ordinanza — n. 34096/2024 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal as inadmissible due to manifestly unfounded generic criticism of conviction.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

IO nato a BARI il 13/01/1978 avverso la sentenza del 17/09/2024 della CORTE APPELLO di BARI dato avviso alle parti; udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere PIETRO SILVESTRI;R.G. n. 32500/2025 CONSIDERATO IN FATTO E IN DIRITTO Visti gli atti, la sentenza impugnata (condanna per il delitto di cui all'art. 337 c.p.); Esaminato il motivo del ricorso proposto da Caradonna Antonio e relativo al giudizio di responsabilità; Ritenuto il motivo inammissibile perché del tutto generico, non essendo stato dedotto alcunchè; Ritenuto, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile, con la condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende; P. Q. M. Dichiara ina P.Q.M