Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 14126/2026 — snpen AI generated

Cassation court dismisses appeal for lack of specific facts regarding the minor offense exemption defense.

Case Number Ordinanza — n. 14126/2026 — snpen
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Italy (IT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible due to the generic nature of the argument. The appellant, Lo Piccolo Giuseppe, challenged a lower court conviction for a crime under Article 385 of the Penal Code by claiming the offense was too minor to warrant punishment. The court rejected this defense because the appeal failed to provide any specific facts or evidence supporting the claim of particular triviality.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 c.p.; Art. 360 c.p.: An appeal challenging the non-punishability of a crime due to particular triviality must be supported by specific facts and cannot be declared inadmissible if merely generic.

Keywords

AI generated
non-punishability defense particular triviality Article 385 Penal Code inadmissible appeal generic argumentation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 c.p.
Art. 360 c.p.
AI generated
Ordinanza — n. 21422/2024 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding non-punishment exclusion as it is a matter of merit, not admissibility.
Ordinanza — n. 14117/2026 — snpen
Italian court dismisses appeal as generic, citing lack of specific facts on non-punishability grounds.
Ordinanza — n. 18952/2023 — snpen
Italian court dismisses appeal for lack of specificity regarding non-punishability cause under Art. 131-bis Penal Code.
Ordinanza — n. 37231/2023 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal on recidivism as fact-based complaints are inadmissible in legitimacy proceedings.
Ordinanza — n. 35884/2024 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to prescription occurring after the appellate judgment.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

nato a PALERMO il 05/02/1987 avverso la sentenza del 28/03/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di PALERMO dato avviso alle parti; udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere PIETRO SILVESTRI;R.G. n. 31056/2025 CONSIDERATO IN FATTO E IN DIRITTO Visti gli atti, la sentenza impugnata (condanna per il reato di cui all'ad, 385 c.p.); Esaminato il motivo del ricorso proposto da Lo Piccolo Giuseppe relativo al mancato riconoscimento della causa di non punibilità per particolare tenuità del fatto; Ritenuto il motivo inammissibile perché del tutto generico; Ritenuto, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile, con la condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende; P. Q. M. Dichiara ina P.Q.M