Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 14115/2026 — snpen AI generated

Cassation court dismisses appeal as generic and inadmissible due to lack of specific factual arguments.

Case Number Ordinanza — n. 14115/2026 — snpen
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Italy (IT)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Corte di Cassazione declared the appeal by Renna Roberto inadmissible for being entirely generic. The appellant failed to deduce any specific facts or arguments regarding the liability judgment from 2024. Consequently, the court rejected the request and ordered the appellant to pay procedural costs and a fine.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 367 c.p.p.; Art. 368 c.p.p.: An appeal is inadmissible if it is entirely generic and lacks any specific factual or legal arguments deduced from the case.

Keywords

AI generated
inadmissible appeal generic grounds lack of deduction procedural dismissal Corte di Cassazione

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 367 c.p.p.
Art. 368 c.p.p.
art. 337 c.p
AI generated
Ordinanza — n. 18252/2026 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal for inadmissibility due to failure to specifically argue in second instance.
Ordinanza — n. 43061/2024 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed for inadmissibility due to generic, assertive complaints lacking critical engagement with the lower court's reasoning.
Ordinanza — n. 13701/2025 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal as inadmissible due to lack of novelty and infounded non-prosecution claim.
Ordinanza — n. 43021/2024 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal as generic, citing first instance judgment on resistance threat element.
Ordinanza — n. 41405/2021 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to generic lack of motivation grounds under new procedural code.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ato a CANOSA DI PUGLIA il 26/11/1997 avverso la sentenza del 05/12/2024 della CORTE APPELLO di BARI dato avviso alle parti; udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere PIETRO SILVESTRI;R.G. n. 3047/2025 CONSIDERATO IN FATTO E IN DIRITTO Visti gli atti, la sentenza impugnata (condanna per il reato dì cui all'art. 337 c.p.); Esaminato il motivo del ricorso proposto da Renna Roberto e relativo al giudizio di responsabilità; Ritenuto il motivo inammissibile perché del tutto generico, non essendo stato dedotto alcunchè; Ritenuto, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile, con la condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende; P. Q. M. Dichiara inamm P.Q.M