Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 13197/2026 — snpen AI generated

Italian court dismisses appeal as inadmissible due to lack of standing and procedural defects.

Case Number Ordinanza — n. 13197/2026 — snpen
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Italy (IT)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Cassazione declared the appeal filed by Collantes Bustamante inadmissible and ordered him to pay costs. The appellant challenged a second-instance judgment from Milan regarding his legal status, but failed to demonstrate a direct interest in the outcome or comply with required procedural steps. Consequently, the court rejected the request without examining the merits of the underlying dispute.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 36, 37, 38 c.p.c.; Art. 101 c.p.c.: An appeal is inadmissible if the appellant lacks standing to challenge the decision or fails to exhaust mandatory preconditions for filing the remedy.

Keywords

AI generated
lack of standing procedural inadmissibility Court of Cassazione civil procedure exhaustion of remedies

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 36 c.p.c.
Art. 37 c.p.c.
Art. 38 c.p.c.
Art. 101 c.p.c.
AI generated
Ordinanza — n. 8565/2024 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding identification certainty and fact-finding reserved for appellate court.
Ordinanza — n. 2877/2025 — snpen
Italian Supreme Court dismisses appeal for inadmissibility due to lack of real compensation offer and procedural defects.
Ordinanza — n. 39023/2024 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed for inadmissibility due to lack of specific argumentation and discretionary sentencing.
Ordinanza — n. 30095/2021 — snpen
Italian court dismisses appeal against criminal non-prosecution due to prescription and procedural violations by public official.
Ordinanza — n. 45991/2023 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal on criminal appeal grounds, upholding lower court sentencing discretion.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ORDINANZA sul ricorso proposto da: COLLANTES BUSTAMANTE JHON SERGIO nato il 07/04/1989 avverso la sentenza del 10/09/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di MILANO dato avviso alle parti; udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere ALESSANDRO MARIA ANDRONIO; P.Q.MDichiara il ricorso inammissibile e condanna il ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di € 3.000,00 in favore della Cassa delle ammende. Così deciso in Roma, il 13 marzo 2026. Il Consigliere estensore