Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 11847/2026 — snpen AI generated

Criminal appeal dismissed as withdrawn by defendant before the court's final ruling.

Case Number Ordinanza — n. 11847/2026 — snpen
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Italy (IT)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Cassazione declared the appeal filed by Dan Lavinia Nicoleta inadmissible because she had formally renounced the recourse on December 16, 2025. Although the case involved a partial reform of the first-instance judgment regarding specific criminal charges, the defendant's subsequent withdrawal rendered the procedural action void. Consequently, the court ordered the dismissal of the appeal and imposed fines and costs on the appellant.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 364 c.p.p.; Art. 365 c.p.p.: A criminal appeal is inadmissible if the appellant renounces the recourse before the court issues its final decision, thereby extinguishing the right to contest the judgment.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal withdrawal inadmissible recourse partial judgment reform procedural extinction court costs imposition

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 364 c.p.p.
Art. 365 c.p.p.
AI generated
Ordinanza — n. 43160/2022 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed due to withdrawal of appeal under Art. 591 lett. d) of Criminal Procedure Code.
Ordinanza — n. 43153/2022 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed due to withdrawal; appellant renounced appeal, making it inadmissible under Art. 591 c.p.p.
Ordinanza — n. 21072/2026 — snpen
Court dismisses appeal due to voluntary withdrawal and orders fine for frivolous filing.
Ordinanza — n. 17134/2025 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed due to applicant's withdrawal, resulting in inadmissibility and costs order.
Ordinanza — n. 2968/2026 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal as withdrawn, ruling the request is inadmissible due to lack of valid submission.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ORDINANZA sul ricorso proposto da: DAN LAVINIA NICOLETA (CUI 05EKYP2) nato il 28/06/1993 avverso la sentenza del 03/07/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di TRIESTE udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere PAOLA BORRELLI;RG 40925/2025 -Udienza del 11 febbraio 2026 -Consigliere Borrelli Considerato che Lavinia Nicoleta Dan (alias Lavinia Nicoleta Iliuta C.U.I. 05EKYP2) ricorre avverso la sentenza emessa dalla Corte di appello di Trieste, che ha parzialmente riformato la sentenza di condanna pronunciata in primo grado per i reati di cui agli artt. 81 cpv. 110, 493 ter cod. pen. (capo A) e artt. 110, 624 bis cod. pen., rideterminando la pena. Rilevato che, in data 16.12.25, l'imputata ha rinunziato al ricorso con dichiarazione rilasciata al Direttore della Casa Circondariale di Venezia. Rilevato, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile, con la condanna della ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di cinquecento euro in favore della Cassa delle ammende. P.Q.M Dichi P.Q.MIN C 3 iAR,2O26