Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 7340/2026 — snpen AI generated

Italian Court dismisses appeal as defendant lacks standing to sue personally without legal representation.

Case Number Ordinanza — n. 7340/2026 — snpen
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Italy (IT)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible because the defendant, Soufi Abdesselam, personally signed the petition while lacking legal standing. The court found that an imputato must be represented by counsel to validly initiate proceedings. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, and the defendant was ordered to pay court costs and a fine.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 113 c.p.p.; Art. 114 c.p.p.: An imputato personally filing an appeal without a lawyer lacks the necessary legal standing, rendering the petition inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
lack of standing personal appeal filing mandatory legal representation imputato procedural rights inadmissible petition

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 113 c.p.p.
Art. 114 c.p.p.
AI generated
Ordinanza — n. 9527/2025 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed for inadmissibility as non-punishment plea lacks merit and facts are reviewable.
Ordinanza — n. 16476/2026 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses request to correct material error regarding civil party expense liquidation. The court ruled the omission was a substantive merit decision, not a correctable clerical error. Consequently, the request for correction is inadmissible under procedural law.
Ordinanza — n. 17485/2023 — snpen
Italian court dismisses appeal for lack of specific legal grounds under Art. 581 and 591 of Criminal Procedure Code.
Ordinanza — n. 28687/2023 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal as inadmissible for censuring a non-appealable merit assessment of sentencing.
Ordinanza — n. 48904/2023 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed as inadmissible for challenging non-appealable temporary modifications of home detention. The court ruled the request was procedurally barred under Article 591 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The appeal was rejected without formalities due to the nature of the contested decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

la seguente ORDINANZA sul ricorso proposto da: SOUFI ABDESLAM nato il 01/06/1983 avverso la sentenza del 04/03/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di NAPOLIudita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere ANGELO CAPOZZI; »v 26822/25- DE PLANO OSSERVA Rilevato che il ricorso è proposto, sottoscrivendolo, personalmente dall'imputato, privo di legittimazione; Ritenuto, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile. Ritenuto che il ricorrente deve essere condannato al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma che si stima equo determinare in euro tremila in favore della cassa delle ammende. P. Q. M. Dichiara inammissibile il ricorso e condanna il ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle Ammende. Così deciso il 23.01