Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 7311/2026 — snpen AI generated

Court dismisses appeal as withdrawn, ordering payment of court costs and fines to the state.

Case Number Ordinanza — n. 7311/2026 — snpen
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Italy (IT)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Cassazione declared the appeal inadmissible because the appellant voluntarily withdrew the request before the hearing. The appellant, Iskhakov Yegor, had previously filed a challenge against a first-instance judgment but subsequently renounced the proceedings. Consequently, the court ordered the appellant to pay the procedural costs and a fine of three thousand euros to the state treasury.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 444 cod. proc. pen.; Art. 360 c.p.p.: A voluntary withdrawal of an appeal renders the proceeding moot, leading to the declaration of inadmissibility and the imposition of costs on the appellant.

Keywords

AI generated
voluntary withdrawal of appeal inadmissibility of proceedings court costs and fines renunciation of litigation procedural economy principle

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 444 cod. proc. pen.
Art. 360 c.p.p.
art. 444 cod. proc. pen
AI generated
Ordinanza — n. 38110/2023 — snpen
Appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to valid waiver of right to appeal after filing.
Ordinanza — n. 14754/2025 — snpen
Appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to the defendant's formal waiver of the appeal rights.
Ordinanza — n. 2968/2026 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal as withdrawn, ruling the request is inadmissible due to lack of valid submission.
Ordinanza — n. 14503/2024 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to formal waiver by the accused under Italian Code of Criminal Procedure.
Ordinanza — n. 35818/2022 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed because defendant ritually waived the appeal, rendering it inadmissible under Italian Code of Criminal Procedure.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

a seguente ORDINANZA sul ricorso proposto da: ISKHAKOV YEGOR (CUI 05SK4BR) nato il 13/02/2003 avverso la sentenza del 29/05/2025 del GIP TRIBUNALE di RIMINIudita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere ANGELO CAPOZZI; 26592/25- DE PLANO OSSERVA Rilevato che il ricorrente ha rinunciato al ricorso proposto avverso la sentenza emessa ex art. 444 cod. proc. pen.; Rilevato, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile, con la condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. P. Q. M. Dichiara inammissibile il ricorso e condanna il ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. Così deciso il 23.01.20