Cassation court dismisses appeal as inadmissible due to lack of manifestly unfounded grounds regarding generic mitigating circumstances.

The Court of Cassation declared the appeal by Giuseppe Marcellino inadmissible and ordered him to pay court costs and a fine. The appellant challenged the lower court's refusal to recognize generic mitigating circumstances for crimes under Articles 624, 625, and 628 of the Penal Code, arguing a violation of law and defective reasoning. The court rejected this claim, noting that the first-instance judgment was logically sound and did not require the judge to consider every favorable element, only the decisive ones.