Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 5307/2026 — snpen AI generated

Appeal dismissed as inadmissible because the defendant personally filed the appeal without proper representation.

Case Number Ordinanza — n. 5307/2026 — snpen
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Italy (IT)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Cassazione declared the appeal filed by Vincenzo Principio inadmissible and ordered him to pay procedural costs. The defendant personally submitted the appeal against the Second Instance Court of Naples judgment without legal representation. The court ruled that personal filing by the accused renders the appeal inadmissible under procedural law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 100 c.p.p.; Art. 101 c.p.p.: An appeal must be filed by a lawyer; personal filing by the accused renders the appeal inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
inadmissible appeal personal filing criminal procedure legal representation Corte di Cassazione

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 100 c.p.p.
Art. 101 c.p.p.
AI generated
Ordinanza — n. 44309/2022 — snpen
Civil appeal dismissed for inadmissibility as it challenges appellate reasoning rather than statutory grounds.
Sentenza — n. 45626/2023 — snpen
Court annuls appeal for defamation by trade unionists using dialectal insults against a company manager.
Ordinanza — n. 21819/2023 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to personal filing violating mandatory defense representation rules.
Ordinanza — n. 788/2025 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed as inadmissible because the defendant personally signed the petition violating Article 613 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Ordinanza — n. 36503/2025 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to generic grounds and lack of specific continuation of penalty argument.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

seguente ORDINANZA sul ricorso proposto da: PRINCIPIO VINCENZO nato a CASERTA il 20/04/1999 avverso la sentenza del 16/05/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di NAPOLIudita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere PAOLO DI GERONIMO; OSSERVA letto il ricorso proposto da Principio Vincenzo avverso la sentenza in epigrafe; ritenuto che il ricorso è stato proposto personalmente dall'imputato; ritenuto, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile, con la condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. P. Q. M. Dichiara inammissibile il ricorso e condanna il ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. Così deciso il 23 gennaio 2026 Il Consigliere estensore Il Presidente