Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 5255/2026 — snpen AI generated

Italian court dismisses appeal as generic and assertive, ordering costs and fine payment.

Case Number Ordinanza — n. 5255/2026 — snpen
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Italy (IT)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Cassation declared the appeal filed by Ansar Youssef inadmissible due to its generic and purely assertive nature. The appellant challenged a second-instance judgment from Venice, but the court found the grounds lacked specific factual or legal arguments. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, and the appellant was ordered to pay procedural costs and a €3,000 fine to the penalty fund.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 366 c.p.c.; Art. 367 c.p.c.: An appeal is inadmissible if formulated in generic and purely assertive terms lacking specific grounds.

Keywords

AI generated
inadmissible appeal generic grounds purely assertive procedural costs penalty fund fine

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 366 c.p.c.
Art. 367 c.p.c.
AI generated
Ordinanza — n. 27852/2022 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal on recidivism and excessive penalty grounds as manifestly unfounded.
Ordinanza — n. 49542/2023 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed as inadmissible because appellant failed to raise liability and mitigation arguments in appeal.
Ordinanza — n. 1314/2023 — snpen
Italian court dismisses appeal as inadmissible because it was directly filed without prior lower court review.
Ordinanza — n. 45394/2024 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal against second-instance plea bargain regarding waived non-prosecution grounds.
Ordinanza — n. 4405/2024 — snpen
Italian Supreme Court dismisses appeal as arguments merely reproduce merits already decided correctly.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

seguente ORDINANZA sul ricorso proposto da: ANSAR YOUSSEF nato il 09/09/1999 avverso la sentenza del 03/02/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di VENEZIAdato avviso alle parti; udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere MASSIMO RICCIARELLI; visti gli atti e la sentenza impugnata; esaminati i motivi di ricorso, OSSERVA Ritenuto che il motivo di ricorso è formulato in termini generici e nneramente assertivi; Ritenuto dunque che il ricorso è inammissibile, conseguendone la condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e, in ragione dei sottesi profili di colpa, a quello della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende, P. Q. M. Dichiara inammissibile il ricorso e condanna il ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. Così deciso il 24 ottobre 2025 Il Cgnsiglire estensore Presidente