Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 2968/2026 — snpen AI generated

Cassation court dismisses appeal as withdrawn, ruling the request is inadmissible due to lack of valid submission.

Case Number Ordinanza — n. 2968/2026 — snpen
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Italy (IT)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Cassation declared the appeal filed by Arsi' Marcello inadmissible and ordered him to pay procedural costs and a fine. The lower court's judgment was based on the appellant's explicit renunciation of the legal recourse. Consequently, the court ruled that without a valid request, the appeal cannot be examined on its merits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 360, n. 1, lett. a) c.p.p.; Art. 360, n. 1, lett. b) c.p.p.: An appeal declared inadmissible when the appellant has formally renounced the recourse, rendering the procedural request void.

Keywords

AI generated
inadmissible appeal renunciation of recourse procedural dismissal court of cassation procedural costs

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 444 c.p.p.
Art. 360, n. 1, lett. a) c.p.p.
Art. 360, n. 1, lett. b) c.p.p.
AI generated
Ordinanza — n. 14503/2024 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to formal waiver by the accused under Italian Code of Criminal Procedure.
Ordinanza — n. 38110/2023 — snpen
Appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to valid waiver of right to appeal after filing.
Ordinanza — n. 14754/2025 — snpen
Appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to the defendant's formal waiver of the appeal rights.
Ordinanza — n. 17134/2025 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed due to applicant's withdrawal, resulting in inadmissibility and costs order.
Ordinanza — n. 21072/2026 — snpen
Court dismisses appeal due to voluntary withdrawal and orders fine for frivolous filing.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

seguente ORDINANZA sul ricorso proposto da: ARSI' MARCELLO nato a SANREMO il 04/03/1980 avverso la sentenza del 07/04/2025 del GIP TRIBUNALE di IMPERIAudita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere PIETRO SILVESTRI; R.G. n. 17770/2025 CONSIDERATO IN FATTO E IN DIRITTO Visti gli atti, la sentenza impugnata, emessa ai sensi degli artt. 444 e ss. cod. proc. pen.; Esaminato il motivo di ricorso; Letta la rinuncia al ricorso; Ritenuto, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile, con la condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende; P. Q. M. Dichiara inammissibile il ricorso e condanna il ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. Così deciso il 6 ottobre 2025.