Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 1202/2026 — snpen AI generated

Cassation court dismisses appeal as inadmissible due to lack of standing by the appellant.

Case Number Ordinanza — n. 1202/2026 — snpen
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Italy (IT)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible because the appellant, Marco Di Mario, lacked legal standing to challenge the lower court's decision. The procedural flaw stemmed from the fact that the individual initiating the review was not authorized to do so under the relevant procedural rules. Consequently, the court rejected the request and ordered the appellant to pay the associated court costs and a fine.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 366 c.p.p.; Art. 103 c.p.p.: An appeal is inadmissible if filed by a subject who lacks the requisite legal standing to challenge the contested judgment.

Keywords

AI generated
lack of standing inadmissible appeal legal standing procedural defect court costs

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 366 c.p.p.
Art. 103 c.p.p.
AI generated
Ordinanza — n. 45205/2023 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal on drunk driving conviction due to verbal right to counsel notice sufficiency.
Ordinanza — n. 33425/2025 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal on criminal record continuity due to lack of premeditation evidence.
Ordinanza — n. 31505/2025 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal against traffic fine for failing to answer doorbell, citing prior convictions.
Sentenza — n. 34327/2021 — snpen
Cassation court annuls appeal judgment because the crime of drunk driving was extinguished by prescription before the final ruling.
Ordinanza 137/2017
Constitutional question dismissed as inadmissible due to prior identical ruling rendering the issue moot.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

a seguente ORDINANZA sul ricorso proposto da: DI MARIO MARCO nato a CECCANO 11 18/11/1988 avverso la sentenza del 04/12/2024 della CORTE APPELLO di ROMAudita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere PIETRO SILVESTRI; R.G. n. 22532/2025 CONSIDERATO IN FATTO E IN DIRITTO Visti gli atti, la sentenza impugnata; Rilevato che il ricorso è stato presentato personalmente dall'imputato; Ritenuto il ricorso inammissibile perché presentato da soggetto non legittimato; Ritenuto, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile, con la condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende; P. Q. M. Dichiara inammissibile il ricorso e condanna il ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. Così deciso il 24 novembre 2025.