Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 1174/2026 — snpen AI generated

Cassation appeal dismissed for inadmissibility due to lack of legal standing to file the appeal.

Case Number Ordinanza — n. 1174/2026 — snpen
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Italy (IT)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Cassation declared the appeal filed by Aziz Bautouil inadmissible and ordered him to pay court costs and a fine. The appellant challenged a first-instance judgment regarding his sentencing and claimed the right to file a cassation appeal was not recognized. The court rejected these arguments as unsupported by law, ruling that the appellant lacked the necessary legal standing to initiate the proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Artt. 444 e ss cod. proc. pen: The right to file a cassation appeal is strictly regulated by law; an appellant lacking statutory standing to propose such a remedy cannot validly initiate the proceedings, rendering the appeal inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal inadmissibility lack of legal standing criminal procedure code right to appeal court costs and fine

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Artt. 444 e ss cod. proc. pen
AI generated
Ordinanza — n. 5823/2026 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed as inadmissible for being generic and outside statutory grounds under Art. 448 CPP.
Ordinanza — n. 44489/2023 — snpen
Cassation Court dismisses appeal against sentencing agreement as grounds are inadmissible under procedural law.
Ordinanza — n. 41320/2021 — snpen
Italian court dismisses appeal against plea bargain sentencing for alleged vague legal qualification errors.
Ordinanza — n. 14715/2025 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed as inadmissible against a settlement judgment under Article 599-bis of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Ordinanza — n. 18313/2025 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed because the imposed sentence matches the agreed terms of the plea deal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

a seguente ORDINANZA sul ricorso proposto da: BAUTOUIL AZIZ (CUI 05G53E0) nato il 28/09/1988 avverso la sentenza del 16/05/2025 del TRIBUNALE di TORINOudita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere PIETRO SILVESTRI; R.G. n. 22314/2025 CONSIDERATO IN FATTO E IN DIRITTO Visti gli atti, la sentenza impugnata, emessa ai sensi degli artt. 444 e ss cod. proc. pen; Esaminati i motivi di ricorso, relativi al trattamento sanzionatorio e al mancato riconoscimento all'imputato del potere di proporre ricorso in cassazione; Ritenuti i motivi non consentiti dalla legge (il primo) e manifestamente infondato (il secondo); Ritenuto, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile, con la condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende; P. Q. M. Dichiara inammissibile il ricorso e condanna il ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. Così deciso il 24 novembre 2025.