Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 22617/2026 — snpen AI generated

Cassation court dismisses appeals against Rome Court of Appeal judgment regarding administrative penalties.

Case Number Ordinanza — n. 22617/2026 — snpen
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Italy (IT)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Cassation Court declared the appeals by Cerilli Stefano and Reffe Ennio inadmissible and ordered them to pay procedural costs. The appellants challenged a November 2025 judgment from the Rome Court of Appeal concerning administrative fines. The court rejected the remedies without examining the merits, citing procedural defects in the original proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 360 c.p.p.; Art. 361 c.p.p.: Appeals are inadmissible if the challenged judgment lacks the requisite form or if the appeal is filed outside the statutory time limits.

Keywords

AI generated
inadmissible appeals procedural defects administrative penalties Cassation review procedural costs

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 360 c.p.p.
Art. 361 c.p.p.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

posti da 1) Cerilli Stefano, nato a Sezze il 21/07/1989 2) Reffe Ennio, nato a Ceccano il 17/03/1989 avverso la sentenza del 19/11/2025 della Corte di appello di Roma letti gli atti del procedimento, il provvedimento impugnato ed il ricorso; udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere Martino Rosati. P.Q.MDichiara inammissibili i ricorsi e condanna i ricorrenti al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. Così deciso in Roma, il 27 maggio 2026. Il Consiglie e estensore La Presid te Marti o Rosati Anna Cr. colo DEPOSITATO IN CANCELLERIA IL 1 8 G I U 2026 1