Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding inadmissibility of evidence due to lack of procedural exhaustion.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant against the lower court's decision to exclude specific evidence. The appellant argued that the evidence was crucial for proving the case facts, while the opposing party contended strict procedural rules required prior exhaustion of remedies. The court ruled that the procedural defect was fundamental and could not be cured by the current appeal, thus upholding the lower court's exclusion of the evidence.