Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sentenza — n. 13097/2026 — snpen AI generated

Cassation appeal dismissed due to loss of interest after preventive measure became ineffective.

Case Number Sentenza — n. 13097/2026 — snpen
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Italy (IT)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court declared the cassation appeal inadmissible because the applicant lost standing after the preventive measure was declared ineffective. The applicant, Meles Provino, sought review of a Catanzaro tribunal decision regarding his detention status, while the prosecutor requested rejection. The court ruled that the procedural interest had vanished due to the subsequent loss of the measure's validity.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 36 c.p.p.; Art. 37 c.p.p.: When a preventive measure becomes ineffective, the corresponding cassation appeal loses its interest and is inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
loss of interest preventive measure cassation appeal procedural standing ineffective measure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 36 c.p.p.
Art. 37 c.p.p.
AI generated
Sentenza — n. 4197/2023 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal for inadmissibility of late request to rescind final judgment due to procedural time limits.
Sentenza — n. 46113/2021 — snpen
Cassation Court dismisses Prosecutor's appeal for lack of interest due to generic arguments and missing current bail needs.
Sentenza — n. 3259/2026 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed due to loss of interest after preventive detention measure was revoked.
Sentenza — n. 47662/2023 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal against detention measures after final conviction becomes legally enforceable.
Sentenza — n. 12647/2024 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal against bail as lower court's preventive measure assessment is legally sound and unreviewable.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

za del 24/04/2025 del TRIB. LIBERTA' di Catanzarovista la relazione svolta dal Consigliere Raffaello Magi;vista la requisitoria con cui il Sost. Procuratore Generale Luigi Birritteri ha chiesto il rigettodel ricorso .RITENUTO IN FATTO1. Con atto del 13 giugno 2025 Meles Provino ha proposto ricorso per cassazioneavverso la decisione emessa dal Tribunale di Catanzaro, Sez. Riesame, in data 24 aprile2025.In data 7 gennaio 2026 il difensore - avv. Pasqualino Capalbo - ha fatto pervenire notacon allegata copia del provvedimento con cui, in data 2 luglio 2025, il GIP del Tribunale diCatanzaro ha dichiarato la perdita di efficacia della misura cautelare.CONSIDERATO IN DIRITTO1. Il ricorso va dichiarato inammissibile per sopravvenuta carenza di interesse. Laragione della inammissibilità esclude la condanna al pagamento delle spese processuali e dialtri oneri. P.Q.MDichiara inammissibile il ricorso per sopravvenuta carenza di interesse.Così è deciso, 08/01/2026Il Consigliere estensore Il PresidenteRAFFAELLO MAGI FILIPPO CASA