Court dismissed execution of foreign judgment due to lack of jurisdiction and procedural defects in enforcement.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Tartu Regional Court dismissed the application to enforce a foreign judgment against the applicant. The applicant argued that the foreign court lacked jurisdiction and failed to serve the applicant properly, while the opposing party insisted on the judgment's validity. The court ruled that the foreign court had no jurisdiction over the applicant and that the procedural requirements for enforcement were not met, leading to the rejection of the execution request.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 17 ust. 2 k.r.s.: A foreign judgment cannot be enforced if the foreign court lacked jurisdiction over the defendant or if the defendant was not properly served with the proceedings.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
!"#$ %$
!&!
'$$()*++++,!)-
%$ &$! $ (! .
$!
"$!(
$
!/("$!
!$
.
%#$"$/!
0 &!/(( / $!$1!2!$ 00+ ! '%%!3 /
+4+405-
$!"$!($!%/(".04+
/$.!$'6""!/($$-1%!
(
$ #$ $"" / $!$1!2!$
!$"33 ' 4 $$ 05- !/($! /("$!! $3!" 0 1%! 3
"%%!3"$!
7#$!$/("$!!"$!$""$! /$!$1!2!$
/(!$"33!$/("$!
&!$/("$!3
$!!"#"$!!$"33
*%%!1$%$$!3 !$"3!
%%!1!!$#!$("%%!#!"3!01%!3!!!
!("$!
!
"#
'-
/$!$1!2!$00+!'%%!3/+4+405-$$
$ $$!(! 8 50 ! $ * $6$4 0
/$
/5$%/(5504/$
/
$/$"04/$4$%$"$!%!!$
!1$!/((/$/66(!!$!4"$!!$!/!1994!!1%!#
%$$!/("$!$
66(/!(!!!$$(!
"#
/$!$#4!(/13!/((3#("$!!
7 8 00 0 ! !!# " $ %$ %$$ (! !
"%%! $ !/("$! !$ $!($ 8! 54 $
66(/! !$ ! $ !$/ "%%( %3/( $ ( $
""$!%!!$3%$4$%$"$!%!!$!1$!/((366(!!$
!4"$!!$!/!199
85$!!0*/%!(4!$66(/!!$!"%%($"$!(
$4!/(#$!$43!$6"/!!$6$!
#61%!!$/$/!$""%%/61%!
/
!$!$/("%%(%33$%$"$!%!
!$!1$!/((4/$"!!04/$'0-/$/!$!
1! 4 "$!!$!/!1994!!!#!"$!(3%/("
$.04/$!/((!$4!!4!6"/!!$
1%!"%%!#6991%!!$
!! 1!# 66(/! % /(" / $!$1!2!$ 00+ !
'%%!3/+4+405-"$!($!"!'04)+:*4,
*)0:-1%!!$
!"#$ %$
/$