Court dismissed execution of foreign judgment due to lack of jurisdiction and procedural defects under Estonian law.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Tartu County Court dismissed the application for execution of a foreign judgment against the applicant. The applicant argued that the foreign court lacked jurisdiction and failed to observe due process, while the opposing party insisted on the judgment's enforceability. The court ruled that the foreign judgment violated Estonian public policy and procedural requirements, necessitating its rejection.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 17 ust. 2 k.r.s.: A foreign judgment may be refused execution if it violates Estonian public policy or if the foreign court lacked jurisdiction over the defendant.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
! "##$ %& ' (&! )*+,---.& +/ 0 1& *&2(&! & & * &!* & & ' 2 0% !& 0 * (! &3 &4& & !! . &' )00 & ! ..-5-5/ (&! & & * .
6 $. ! &!* &0
* 00 &3 66* && 0 & ! " # !$ (! &3 &4& & !! . &' )00 & ! ..-5-5/
(&! & *&7-"$' & ' . 6 $. ! ! (&! & & 00 * 0 !* 0 &
0 &' &&3&!* *!!' && &&&!& 388 &&30
& 0 &!* & ' 7',0 & %& &!* !& & ' &&!'3& 66* !&!&!!& &!* & * !* &&% # !! 00 &&0 % 0 *& &!* & & ' *
)/ 0 ! & 5 & !* & & & !0 % & 66* !& .5 $. 0& & !*
1 & *& & 66* && & * $. ! ! * &!!& &!* & * &%0
0 * *