Court dismissed execution of foreign judgment due to lack of jurisdiction and procedural defects.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Tartu Regional Court dismissed the application to enforce a foreign judgment against the defendant. The plaintiff argued the judgment was final, while the defendant contested jurisdiction and procedural flaws. The court ruled that the foreign court lacked jurisdiction and the proceedings were procedurally defective, thus refusing enforcement.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 18 k.r.s.: A foreign judgment cannot be enforced if the foreign court lacked jurisdiction or if the proceedings were procedurally defective.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
! "#$% &
& '!# !(# ) *( + # ,(- ./0 #-1 $ #( ! #2($# #3 ) &%!$2# +& ($ & '!# !( *( + # " 2 #4# /5/ #3 ,!& 2 /7/75..1 $ #( # ! / 2 #2($# #3
&&# ## ! % #( $&&#%# ! $6# 5 &#! 6 # ## &#$#
" 2 ##4# /5/ #3 ,!& 2 /7/75..1 *( + #(# 8 . 3 5 # !3 5 !97 / 23
2 99(2# # 2( ! $&&( &6 &# 2( 223 (% !7 $## #2 # ::7 ##& # & ! #2($ #3
# & #7 # 99(2# 2 2( # $ #( ! &
,1 !
; 8 55 3 &#%7 # ! #2($2# #3 # # $23 6# ! $ ! 99(2# 2 #22# #2(# ($ ! 2(7 ##% $ $& $# 6&% & !(# ! #2($# #3 ($
'!#(# 67 # 99(2# 2 $ #( ! ) / 2 2( #22# #2(# ($7 #% 6& & !( ($
"#$% & 2