Court dismissed appeal against conviction for theft, upholding original verdict based on sufficient evidence.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the appellant's appeal against the first-instance judgment convicting him of theft. The prosecution presented evidence of stolen goods and witness testimony, while the defense argued regarding the circumstances of the taking. The appellate court found the lower court's assessment of facts correct and the evidence sufficient to support the conviction.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedCriminal Code § 161; § 162: The court established that an appeal against a conviction for theft is dismissed when the evidence regarding the taking of property and the identity of the perpetrator is sufficient and the lower court's factual assessment is not overturned.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
!!"" #$%#&%$ $$%'%(% )*'+,%'&%#-.(% ) + /01&*2222222222222222222222222222 22221%%34.5.6 177'%&&$%$
$+*%&%&8&%$9*%$$ $9&**3% ! "
#$ %&'()*+),)()*%())) - .. / 0#'1'
2 )34 5, 6 # '*3 )
,77 / 0
6 / 0
'16 '%66 ''-)*$
&%$%%(&%&'%*&9 #*&%*%*&3 &%&&'*&**%&#%&&$3&%& '%3&%$%%(1'%&%$*&&*$ &%$%%(&%&*$$&*&%&3'*& %%&4:#&&*&$%(*&5%% 6&' *&3%&' %$($$*& ;#<3 #&%$ #$%