Court dismissed enforcement action against a person subject to a travel ban due to procedural defects.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the enforcement action filed by the execution officer against a defendant subject to a travel ban. The defendant argued that the enforcement order was invalid because it was issued without proper notification and failed to address specific procedural requirements. The court ruled that the lack of due process and failure to comply with statutory notification rules rendered the enforcement order legally ineffective.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 18 k.r.s.: An enforcement order against a person subject to a travel ban is invalid if issued without proper notification or failure to comply with statutory procedural requirements.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
!" #$ %
&& %" ' %# " ( "") # " ""#) " " * !"#$ % !
&'()'& ""%) """%' +" #) "+" "% $) ""#) " " * ,+ " && %" '%# " ( "" "* ,- , ) # " ""#) "%* "*" "."" (
" "# //# )' "") # " "#.+)"""# " ) ) "'") "" 0!" #$ %