Court dismissed individual's appeal against administrative decision regarding residence permit refusal based on insufficient evidence.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the individual's appeal against the administrative body's decision to refuse a residence permit. The applicant argued that the refusal violated their rights, but the administrative body maintained that the applicant failed to meet the statutory requirements for long-term residence. The court upheld the decision because the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence to overturn the administrative finding of non-compliance.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedResidence Act § 10; Residence Act § 11: An administrative decision refusing a residence permit is valid if the applicant fails to demonstrate that the statutory conditions for granting the permit are met.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
!"# $!% !&'''( ( ()&*$%*'()(+),)(*$% +'()(--.-)!-&'(/0 /# #1)') ."")%2)-#/ 313/%#/313/1
((24//#5#3)'46666666666666377 8)'3 )(&((9(2-(:
! "# " $ % "# $ !
&'(&)()+
! ),&-.*+.*&*,,/ ),&-.*+. *&*,,+( 0 12)' &$&#$
1)&- & ! % ! ! ( 3!
1), ! !
$ )45 !
6 (
78 $
&&*,&499)*&9( !
( )+)').$(&)(2(-(2.2()(-2%.)-2)'+"). %'3.))).!()3((-($(9)!()-$ '))2(%'('1+").%'3.))).!()
: *$%*'()(+),)(*$%+'()(--.-)!-&'()9((( ()'' ;#/'9/%"9(!$')!)9.(9/.(<(3 5-( )-)''-)((%."'()!)-)')%)(-2%--$-2%')-2!()9 (%'(!)-)') -)('3)-(!)2)2."")%2)')& <(2%!)-)')2."")%2)'$+)2 -$&."'()!)-)')% )(-2%(%'(.)."'%)-22)(93)( (."")%2)+2.2 $)-2(23)<<2(2( ( ;#/'9/%"9(.'(,())(.)."")92) (!)+-)!()%))$')&!)-)'( (."")%2) ;#0'9/+/')' '$+)2)92)."")--)+2!()$ ))&)%(-22) ;2)/#'9/%/#+ -(