Court dismissed enforcement of foreign judgment due to lack of jurisdiction and procedural defects.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Pärnu County Court dismissed the enforcement application for a foreign judgment against the respondent. The applicant argued that the judgment should be recognized, but the court found the foreign court lacked jurisdiction over the respondent. Consequently, the court ruled that the judgment could not be enforced due to these fundamental procedural flaws.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 28 k.r.s.: A foreign judgment cannot be enforced if the foreign court lacked jurisdiction over the defendant or if the proceedings were unfair.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
!""## !! #! # $ % # && ' (#)##&*+,,-.!//////////// //////////////////0& #!1 1# ! " #$% % % #$ $ $% & # ! ! ! !! #! # % '(# % % # ! '$% - 2 ! !1%% !""## !! #! $ % # &&& #!1 1#' (# !! #! $ % #!&!!!#&.1#! !2.!'(# !3&! #!&!& ! #&!& ( 4,,3* !!2.#55&& !#&1#! ! #!&.!2 1 1 . 1# % !2 !! #! # & ! # &1# ! !#3
&1! !#6