Court dismissed enforcement of foreign judgment due to lack of jurisdiction and procedural defects in the original proceedings.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Tartu Regional Court dismissed the enforcement application for a foreign judgment against the applicant. The applicant argued the judgment was final, while the respondent contended the foreign court lacked jurisdiction and the proceedings were flawed. The court ruled that the foreign judgment violated the principle of mutual recognition due to these fundamental procedural defects.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 17 ust. 2 k.r.s.: A foreign judgment cannot be enforced if the foreign court lacked jurisdiction or if the proceedings were conducted in violation of fundamental principles of justice.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
! "# $$%%# & ' ( &
) "*&&+,%-..#..-. ,/ 0& 1& & + 2
) "& & + & "+ & &' 20& &" # 1"+ + (" & &) 3 & & "" #44. ' *00 " . . #%#/
) "&& + & 0 "+ 2- "&5- &6& 2 &' 5*& /)0 +
) "& & & (" & &) 3 & )& & "" & "+ & "+& & % )0 00 & ! & & "+& &
&& (" & &) 3 &
) ""+ & & "+&
1 & "+& '
) "& && & "+ & & %00 )& 66+ 0& & )& & "" & 00 ) & # )0 )0 & && & &+
00 + &)&+& + & + 00
*/ ! "# (" & &) 3 & & "" #44. ' *00 " . . #%#/ &
&
) "& && +75'% &' &6& "&
) "&" & - "& "
) " & & 00 + 0 "+ & 0& &
0 ' &)&"+ +"&"' & &&" )88 )0
0& & "+ & &'
66+ " + & &+ "# "&& +")"+ + + & ! 7 ## ' # & 0& 0& & + 00 & "+ & &' & + & 7$ 5 & 66+ " & & &" 00 + 0 "+ &
+ & & 0 ' &0 '& & 0& & 0 ' &)&"+ + 66+ & &&" )88 75&' #$%"0
+ &66+ "& 00 +&& + & "+ & &' &6" &6& 6)0 &"&"' & 00 "6)0 "
) "& & "+00 + 0 & 0& & 0 ' &)&"+ +"&"' & &&" )88
" + + "+ + &' ' 6" &)0 00 688)0 &"&"' & 00 "6)0
' ) 66+ " 0 "+ (" & &) 3 & & "" #44. ' *00 " . . #%#/00 + & "+ - "&-,.95- &6& 5-,#5)0 &