Court dismissed execution appeal against a final administrative decision regarding a public service contract. The court upheld the lower court's ruling that the administrative body acted within its authority. The court found the administrative body's actions were lawful and within its statutory powers. The court rejected the appellant's arguments regarding procedural errors and lack of legal basis. The court determined the administrative decision was valid and enforceable. The court concluded the execution appeal lacked merit and was therefore dismissed. The court affirmed the finality of the administrative decision. The court ruled that the administrative body had acted correctly. The court found no grounds to overturn the administrative decision. The court maintained the lower court's judgment as final and binding.





   



 

  

     
  
!"
#$$%"


    

   $$%!


"#$&
'$
($
"
#%)%
    
%
*  
%#++

       

                              !""               

    !       
#   


%$
#%$%
*
&
%%
%#
/
%$
%$!
%$!
#++%
%
#""&!
""$
1$%$
!+$"$"$
""
%&$
%$&
!+#



0
23
"

%&&
%""&$&
!
%


 * 
.
%"$


%
#""&
#""&#$%
""$
1$%$
$"$
$%%$$
#""&"$"$
#%$%&
%$
%+%#$"$
455#$


&.
"$
#""&$
%$%#$%

$
"#&
$%%$+%&
$&$"
$%$$#$"$
 
  
#""$
%
,""

$"%
&&
&
#%%$"##%$%
/ 3 
!

 2 
 6 
!
$""$
4!%$%
%$%&
$
"$
&&"
* 6 
$
"&
&

%%
%&
$"%
"%$
,""4&#$
3

%
%+%&
$
"$





%
*  
#++$


%
#""&
#""&#$%


%
* / 
%$
#%$%&
%
*
&
%%

455%
%+%#$"$

4"%
%#$4&&
#$&

$%$$"%
7$$%&
!
%$#
$"%$&
%""$%$
#%%$%+%#$
%
$
"$
,"""&$"%
4!$&%&


    


%$#
"&#$"

$
$""$

%
%.

%$
"%
$""$
"


    


%%&
#++$.$
#%$!"&$
"$.
$%
,,&#%$%

%
* / 
%$

0
*
!+

%$&
%%
*
"$
%$
%#
/
%$
%$!
#%
%%
%$&
!+#

0
23
"

+%$%%&
%""&$&
#""&#$%
$"$

"$
%
&
%+%#
%%
$%&
%$
%$%%&
!
%%"


%
$
%&
,,&#%$%
!$"%
4!$&&
%%$
#%%$%+%#%

%""$%$
!
%%$
%+%#$$
%&
$$#$$"$"%
#%%%
#

4!$&%"%
,,&#%$%"$

%
* / 
%%$
#%$%&
%$*
&
%%
455&
%+%#$"$






8%&
#++$
%$$#$"
!&.

 
00&$%
/*
/*





'$
($

"
#%)%