Court dismissed enforcement of foreign judgment due to lack of jurisdiction and procedural defects.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Pärnu District Court rejected the enforcement application for a foreign judgment against the applicant. The applicant argued the judgment was final and binding, while the respondent contended the foreign court lacked jurisdiction and the proceedings were flawed. The court dismissed the request because the foreign judgment did not meet the statutory requirements for enforcement under Estonian law.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 18 k.r.s.: A foreign judgment may be enforced in Estonia only if the foreign court had jurisdiction and the proceedings complied with due process requirements.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
!
" #
$ "! !
%
% & #
' (( " % % #
)
*+"
% , " " -
. // + * # * (
" + +
*
(
& %
*2%
" '#
%
" % %
' % ' 33
'# % % % '# %% 1122
' % #
4 % * # *
'
% # 4%
% 4 "# 33
% #
& " %
'# %
% # " ' % ' 33% %
'" '"
% "% %
% " & / + #
(% (
(
#
%' 56
- &
/
+
#* " " %
/ # * " # *72 *21
# * *
% % )
,
" " - *+"
#
%
(%% 5
( #
56
& #
% %
& % (( "
"
$ "
' %
*
" % #%
%
&