Court dismissed enforcement of foreign judgment due to lack of jurisdiction and procedural defects.
Estonia (EE)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Pärnu County Court dismissed the enforcement application for a foreign judgment against the applicant. The applicant argued that the foreign court lacked jurisdiction and failed to serve the applicant properly, while the opposing party insisted on enforcing the decision based on its finality. The court ruled that the foreign judgment was not enforceable because the applicant had not been given a reasonable opportunity to present their case, violating fundamental procedural rights.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 17 ust. 2 k.r.s.: A foreign judgment cannot be enforced if the person against whom it is directed was not given a reasonable opportunity to present their case.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
!" #$ % &' ( ) *+,!
-- !! ! ! . $ ! % # *!# /)! !$%! ) # %!##)! !'
! " 0 #$%!& $'%%( ) *!# /)! !$%! $ !! 1 ! * +, , ,,---*,* ,,**) # -,.23 ! -/ 0112 * ) *!# /)! !$%! ($ !! 1 ! ' * , , ,,333 4*,* ,,**) # % ,, . ! !' ,/.
0 112 * # !#)!52 2 ''4* * ,,-** 5 4* * ,,- 5 3* * ,,- 5 3*,* ,,+** 5
# % ) %(! !# ) 0 % $ %2 ! !! ! ) #%(! !#!#) ) 067 -- !! ! ! . $ ! % # *!#/)! !$%! ) # %!##)! !'2 %!# !$% )0 !)#!'! !*!#/)! !$%)) % #!'%!##)! !' !2 ! ! % ## ($## !' *!# /)! !$%! ) #
%!# ## !'2$!## 86 '0$ !4" #$ %