Court dismissed appeal against settlement agreement regarding child custody and support payments.
Estonia (EE)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court rejected the appellant's request to annul the settlement agreement reached between the parties. The agreement covered child custody arrangements and financial support obligations, which the opposing party successfully defended as binding. Since the settlement was voluntary and did not violate any legal prohibitions, the court upheld its validity and dismissed the appeal.
Legislator headnote
AI generateds. 100 of the Civil Procedure Code; s. 101 of the Civil Procedure Code: A settlement agreement reached by the parties in court proceedings is binding and cannot be annulled unless it violates mandatory legal provisions or was reached under duress or fraud.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
!"# $ %&#
'( )''* +
,-./0 %1
''221 3..+&45
4
(( 5 #( * ' 115 &5 !"#
$%&% '( ) *+ )'(,&-.*/ 0.1&() * $.. 0/- + )0*
/ 0-'') *
"
-(2+
0(&&((-%'4.(00 5 +
&&0(&-''6.(.7 +
%0(((.%616 $1( )0*
8 2 9 2 %1(( ) * 0(&&((-%6(((0' 5 +
/ &6(((%4.4. + /
+ /
2 ++
+ /
/ : 4 + & ) ++ *
;+ ;+ + / + 01+
/
:01 + ; ''221 * * 1 $&&% (6
( ( '''' 1$ 13-./+&4 54
71 + ) + ''' ' ( # 5
2 ' *+ + )1-'-''
'( # 5 5 -8*/ 71
'
454* 71 + + )1 ( *
1 5 1 * ( $ %&% +&4 5 6 5
' 45 + 1 % 9 1 '' 221 3 .. +&4
(( + 14
+
(( ' '' 221 3..+&4
11+ 4
(( ' % 94 1
(( &)&& &4221 5''+
+ 5115 &5 7 1 '' 1 221 +
5 6 4 4 +711
(( ( 9 (
'' 7 5 4+&&' 3 ..
& 1 ( 7) ( 9
221 5
-(&5&&*' '8:-;' 4 1' 3& && & & +42 ,0 * 4 48--''4 1 + 8 (&5 ' 3 4 57
& 71 + 74 2 ,0 ' '' 4
4 * ( 947 1
(( 1* 7 ) 4+7 1
( 5) 5 1' % 9+221 5 + 1* 1+&&517 1
((+1' :
)*
(( +&4 1#318/.&
1'221 5* ( 9 + + 1
4 * 1 +&&51 7 1
(( +1*
15)
((7 '5 4 ' ) * '' ) 221 1 3 .. +&4 5 6 5
(+ )7
(( ' 5 ''
(&5 +
'7 (&5 8 , '0' 5 1'7( 1
+ 99 1() (7 +1 3 & 1* ' 1 && ' #3- 4(/*-/ )'' 5& +7 1 * 2217 *( 4 &&'% 4 && 8 44 1 . ' 4 + 1) 4#31 .<./*<*</*8< %1