Court dismissed appeal against conviction for theft, rejecting argument that stolen goods were returned before trial.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance conviction for theft, upholding the original judgment. The defendant argued that the stolen items were returned to the victim prior to the trial, which should have mitigated the severity of the crime. The court rejected this claim, ruling that the return of goods does not negate the commission of the theft or justify a reduction in the penalty.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedKriminaalkohtuasjaade § 100; § 101: The return of stolen property before the conclusion of the proceedings does not constitute a ground for reducing the criminal penalty.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
!
"
! "
# "
"
""" $
%
"
!
"
#$%&#%#&&'% (
) * ++ ,&
#$%&,%#&&'% )
-&%&'%#&&'%%
&& ""'
("
!&& "( ")&"
!&& "&"
""!
%
*++!
! ,
) -.%
%)$).%)$& %
! -.%%)$)
& %
"%
"%
% -.%)$& %
"%
"% -.
% "'
"
!%
-.$% "&&
"!
"" +"&& !
" !%
%
"
""%- "%&&
%
"&
"!!
"!/+
!
"%"
! !""(
!!"
$
,
* '
"
%
"%
%
$
$&& "% &&
%
"&
"! /
&
+!
00!
"
$
$(
"
"""" $
%
""")" %)
"!!+!
00!
"&
%
"
' && !&
&
+!
00!
1
"""!"& ("$ && "
! !
! "
#
% "")"""!"") "
(
"% "%
""
"!"
"
!
%
(&
2 3
"*
"
' && !
)&"
&
!
! "" "
%
" "
! "%
""
""
"%
""
"" *
! "
) !
2!
00"""
&
) ()
"!!2 3&
"&"%
" '
%
( &
2 3
"" "
%
"2 3&
""((&
"
* !"
2 3 " % 4
! "
% %"(&
%
""
" !
! () "
"
( " 5!
"
! "
%
")'"! ! ( !
"" "
%
$
)&& !&
"! &
+!
00!
"
$
""!"" ")' "-""""%
"()
"!!""
" ! "&
"&"%
""(&& """! " %
"!"
! !" -.$%.$%
-.
$%