Court dismissed appeal against conviction for theft, rejecting argument that stolen goods were returned before trial.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Pärnu District Court dismissed the defendant's appeal against his criminal conviction for theft. The defendant argued that the stolen goods had been returned to the victim before the trial concluded, which should have mitigated the severity of the crime. The court rejected this claim, ruling that the return of property does not negate the commission of the theft or justify overturning the final judgment.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedCriminal Procedure Code § 329; Criminal Code § 169: The return of stolen goods prior to the conclusion of criminal proceedings does not constitute a ground for quashing a final judgment of conviction.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
!" # $ " " % & ' $# % ( )(* + "+ " + ,, % "+ --+ % ( $ , ! !$ &"
% .
% ( + -- /& 0 1
$% $ % "
2 & "& 0 $ " ---+ $ $ 2 $ % "+ $ "+ $ 0$ 2 % + ,, ( " /$ 2 % ,, " + % ( ,,$ % -" " "+ ,, + 3 +$ & ( + "%%
( + % % ( & % "$ & $,, +$ $ 4% % %
& $ & --+ + $ $+ ,, 1 / % "& " - " "% % "& ( + - " "% 5+ - ,,% $
6 1 / % $ 11 0 % / % $ 0 % $ 0
.
! /& 0 % % ( + - ) * " "%% - ) * "
% "
--+ , $
"+& " $ ) $$* &