Court dismissed appeal against conviction for theft, rejecting argument that stolen goods were returned before trial.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the defendant's appeal against his conviction for theft, upholding the first-instance judgment. The defendant argued that the stolen items were returned to the victim prior to the trial, which should have mitigated the severity of the crime. The court rejected this claim, ruling that the return of goods does not negate the commission of the theft or justify overturning the conviction.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedKriminaalkohtu seaduse § 100; § 101: The return of stolen property before the conclusion of criminal proceedings does not constitute a ground for quashing a final conviction for theft.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
! " #$ $ "$%"&$""'$"" (& $)%*+ , $' '
"'" " ""$-'."$"& $ "$'' %"&$'' +/ "'$"0 & $ "$''0 &"''0 112 112/ 12 12/ 1!2 1!2/ 1/2 1/2/ 1 2 1 2/ 12 12/+/ $ "$''%"&"&""$ &"&"&$$ $#$*.#$"&3'$ $*%+"$ $*"+'"$&*&""*" "' $"
( 4(564(7875 79 (& $)%*33&"""& ""$-%'."$"&
$ " $*' "$ : $*' - ;+ '' 5 '."$" " * % & 1 % " - .-# $$" +/ 9$$ $'%&
-*.'&&''&"&&$ (( $&+$""".%$&"&4&&$$$"&"+'" <%< "$# $ "$ '' % "&$ "'$ %"& $ $$ *. &$"$ &$ #$ "