Court dismissed appeal against conviction for theft, upholding original verdict based on sufficient evidence.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court rejected the appellant's appeal against the first-instance conviction for theft, maintaining the original judgment. The prosecution alleged the defendant stole property, while the defense argued the evidence was insufficient to prove the act beyond reasonable doubt. The appellate court found the lower court's assessment of the facts correct and the evidence adequate to support the conviction.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedCriminal Procedure Code Art. 327; Criminal Procedure Code Art. 328: An appeal against a conviction is dismissed if the appellate court finds the lower court's evaluation of facts and evidence correct and the conviction legally sound.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
!!"# $%&##'(
)*"+#,*#$%&
,- ! .#+ !'/! ' %"!01(2!0 ! !& #22 "#&0#0"'## "$%2#&&
330! #445/6.#45.%5!302& * 6*6*6*#$%&!&&#'( / 4)5/)# #(# #("!5#'&!7 * ,**,*#$%&##'( / 4-5/# ## #"#+#0'# !&5!2!!## #.#,'!'# #.#5#7 )* -*)**#$%&##'( / #468595/ 6.#5### #"#&5! #4-6### # '# #.#5#7 #! /::# 0 %! 2! $%& ##'( **,2%%5#* 6* 6*,**#$%&##'( / #45/6.# 5 # ## # "#&5! # 4 -6 # ## # '# #.#5#* %% 50 '#! # 0)'#*
;'&0'(# #('2!'0'(#0# 0)***#
;'&0"#(! #2!&'(#0# 06**,*# <(!&00 4)5-'( #= 330! &&! #0#! 2& #45/6.#45.%5!.#2;! # #'#! '3' '"#&5! *
# 4 , 5 # !! # #& 0 '#! 5# $%& ##'( -*)* 5# 2;! 0 '#! '#&02# ##9**'322'0.#-/%"#.#2;! # #!! '#! '3' ! '0.# -/%"#"#&5! *
#! #.##5 #"# # 2### )*"+#! ,*#*
;'&0
'( .; 2!* %.#2;! #! 2&> !!5! 0&0#(#6'&!.# #!!5!;!5#+! )8 '&!* &0#(#.# #!!5!;!5#+! #0#)/%"#.'#(#&02!&! !2!#"0#" )68- !?(!/#&5#"!! &2+86,,* /# !&!;!5'# #2!"! # #0#$%&##'( '!.#!' ! 2/%"#.'* /# !& ! # #' '( '!.#!' /%"# .' ## /%"# 9 2! '( 2& / &";!2#!' "0#'( 5#* + !'/!
( &!'