Court dismissed appeal against conviction for theft, rejecting argument that stolen goods were returned before trial.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the defendant's appeal against the conviction for theft, upholding the first-instance judgment. The defendant argued that the stolen items were returned to the victim prior to the trial, which should have negated the criminal act. The court rejected this claim, ruling that the return of goods does not erase the completed nature of the theft offense.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedCriminal Code § 160; § 161: The return of stolen property before the conclusion of criminal proceedings does not negate the completion of the theft offense.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
!"
!
"
#!
# $% & % '' % "
&
()
)*+ ,
" &
,
" &&"$-"
"
$
-..& & # $ )
- * ,
,
/
0 &
" %
&)
-* 0 ,
''
%#
$,
,&
/&&
1& # $ ,
, & & ,
/&&)
-* ( ,
,
/ # $ 0(
&
2 &
"&
"
0 %"
0++3
&
,
/ # $ %(
/
&
2 &
"&
"
0 %
"
0++3
" &&" $ -"
" '' & / +0% (
1/ &&
&"&,
" &1 $
%
1 /
" &
,
, " ,% "/
"
)
"/ & (
",4
,&
- &
,/ "/ &,/
.
, ) &
& , , &% &
''
&
-..&"#$(//
" 5 & , &
1 $ " &
%/,&" &"
- ..&..&"#$)
-*,
"6
"
)
'
!
%,$-"
",..&"
#$ &%
'
/ ..&"#$)
-*
,
"6
"
0&" %
&
)
-* 0 ,
''
%#$,
,&
/&&1&#$,
,&&,
/&&)
-* ( ,
)
,& , , && )
- *& 0 07 0+ %
..&" #$ ..&
/
/ & " &&"& /
,
8
"
(
%
%(
) %(
%
&
9%%(
) 8