Court dismissed appeal against conviction for theft, upholding original verdict based on sufficient evidence and procedural compliance.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court rejected the appellant's appeal against the first-instance conviction for theft, maintaining the original judgment. The prosecution alleged the defendant stole property, while the defense argued for acquittal based on lack of evidence. The court found the evidence sufficient to prove the crime and dismissed the appeal as procedurally unfounded.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedCriminal Procedure Code § 321; Criminal Procedure Code § 322: An appeal against a conviction is dismissed if the appellate court finds the lower court's decision legally sound and the evidence sufficient to support the conviction.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
!
"## $
%
&
% %#
& '&#%
& #' #
#
#%%#
()*& %
& %#
!"
#
$ %% &''
(()'*)(''+
,
-#
.
/
%%
, $ %%)
++
# ,## - . /&# ,+#
%#
&++
# +%%#& ## +
0#% ,+#% # %'
&++
#.#
%&#
0
*& %
&&- %#%'//'
$ % %#0
&
12!
3 (1 0 +
0
%%' # 0 %#0 % 0 & %#
%#0 *& %
& %%' %# #%# %+ %& %%# &#%%'
%
-'# '
!
.
%
%&# #
# #%%## *& %
& %#####0#%'## %+ '%#&++
%'%
-'# '
4%%#'#% +%. #% *& %
&
#% %#' % %# ((1
11 %#&# %%#0 &++
%' % 0 & 0
%#0 # '
%
-'# '5& #%, #&%,% '&++
%'#%
% #%#%'##'%%
.%%#&%& #%-%% %#&
##
#% &#%%'#&
& '&#% #%#'&%6# + '##
#&
#0 %
##
& %#6 # # %'
& '&#% # % '
'&#%# & %%# %+ %& # #%#' %# %6 # ' & + %& #0
%#%
#&#
%
#0 %
'&#%# 1 !71 )(1 7(1 *& %
&
%%'++
%#'#" #'#3))
3!0!3
+
0
%
'#0
11 *& %
&
%##%
% %&//'%
-#%#
& #,-%# % # # ' #'# %88%
& ,+# *& %
&
%'#,#0& %%#,88
%
%%%+ %& ## '&++
%%#%+ #'%
/' %88+
-%%#
###'#%*& %
&
%##%#%#&#%,%&++
%'
%
-'# '
%#'
& '
%##.
#%%#,#
&++
%
& '##*& %
& #%+ #'%& ''# #
-#'#-%&%+ %& #5%+ %%#/' %88'% #%#
1
# .#%*& %
& #&++
%'
%#%+ %& ##,88
& ## #+##
%%
.##%#&% %&//' # -#'#-%&%+ %& #
%+ #'%#
####0
%
% %#
& '&#%
%%,-#'%'.
'& ##
%##.&++
###%'#%0 #'# ''#
3) 0
3 )0%
"## $
%