Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
1-08-5294\25 AI generated

Appeal against criminal conviction dismissed as clearly unfounded due to procedural error in appeal submission.

Case Number 1-08-5294\25
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Estonia (EE)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tallinn District Court dismissed the appeal against the Harju County Court's conviction of I.P. The defendant argued for a new trial, but the court found the appeal clearly unfounded based on the record. Consequently, the original judgment regarding the conviction under the Criminal Procedure Code was upheld without modification.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Criminal Procedure Code § 266; § 200: An appeal against a criminal conviction is dismissed if the appellate court finds the appeal clearly unfounded based on the established facts and legal reasoning.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal clearly unfounded conviction upheld procedural error Criminal Procedure Code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Criminal Procedure Code § 266
Criminal Procedure Code § 200

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

K O H T U M Ä Ä R U S

Kohus Tallinna Ringkonnakohus Määruse tegemise aeg ja koht

29. detsember 2008. a

Kriminaalasja number 1-08-5294 Kohtukoosseis Paavo Randma, Malle Preimer, Jüri Paap Apelleeritud kohtuotsus

Harju Maakohtu 15. oktoobri 2008. a otsus I.P süüditunnistamises ja karistamises KarS § 121, § 266 lg 2 p 2 ja § 200 lg 1 järgi Apellatsiooni esitaja Süüdistatav I.P Resolutsioon

Jätta I.P apellatsioon kui ilmselt

põhjendamatu läbi vaatamata Edasikaebamise kord

Määruse peale võib süüdistatav advokaadist kaitsja vahendusel esitada määruskaebuse Riigikohtule 10 päeva jooksul Tallinna

Ringkonnakohtu kaudu alates päevast, mil menetlusosaline sai vaidlustatavast kohtumäärusest teada või pidi teada saama.