Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
1-08-16206\1 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal against prosecutor's order to return seized property to the victim.

Case Number 1-08-16206\1
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Estonia (EE)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tallinn District Court rejected Maria Prõtkova's appeal against the State Prosecutor's order to return seized property. The prosecutor determined that the items were not evidence of a crime but belonged to the victim, warranting their return. The court upheld this decision, ruling that the prosecutor acted within its authority to manage seized assets based on the nature of the items.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Criminal Procedure Code § 199; Criminal Procedure Code § 200: The prosecutor may order the return of seized property if it is determined to belong to the victim and is not evidence of a crime, and such orders are subject to judicial review.

Keywords

AI generated
seized property return victim ownership prosecutor authority criminal procedure code judicial review appeal evidence exclusion asset restitution

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Criminal Procedure Code § 199
Criminal Procedure Code § 200

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

1-08-16206

K O H T U M Ä Ä R U S

Kohus Tallinna Ringkonnakohus Määruse tegemise aeg ja koht

10. 12. 2008. a Tallinn, kirjalik menetlus Alustamata kriminaalasja number 1-08-16206 (08230105200) Kohtunik Malle Preimer Vaidlustatud lahend Riigiprokuratuuri 20. 10. 2008. a määrus Kaebuse esitajad ja kaebuste liik Maria Prõtkova, kaebus RESOLUTSIOON Jätta Maria Prõtkova kaebus Riigiprokuratuuri 20. 10. 2008. a määruse peale sisuliselt läbi vaatamata ja tagastada kaebus selle esitajale.