Court dismissed enforcement of foreign judgment due to lack of jurisdiction and procedural defects under Estonian law.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the enforcement application for a foreign judgment against the defendant. The applicant argued that the judgment was final and binding, while the defendant contested the foreign court's jurisdiction and procedural fairness. The court ruled that the foreign court lacked jurisdiction and failed to observe due process, rendering the judgment unenforceable in Estonia.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 17 ust. 2 k.r.s.: A foreign judgment cannot be enforced in Estonia if the foreign court lacked jurisdiction or if the proceedings did not comply with Estonian procedural requirements.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
! !" #" $$%&% ' #(
!"#!#$! "%&'" "(
)**+",,,
-- . !%/0 !"01%/".221*&+ )*+,-.+/,, +0$1 1 !"#!#$!
(2 34 !!1!"#!#5!! ! * 33 2" . -# 23 !" 33 3 " !3 0# 23 33 !"
#0" #""#
" #4# 52 " ! %/ 0 33 !
2 # #"""# 0 " ! 2# " #""!33 ! # !3 " #""# 0 " 4# 52 "# 0 "3 23 "1 * " %% "+%
* "% ) " % "
" "4# 52 0 " "!3 .! 2.! # #""# " 4# 52 0 # "0# .# #0 " 0!"4# 52 "
" ! #0 # #""# " .! 2.! 0 #" "
" ! !" # 2## 33 6 " 7 /*8)% "0 !
6 " #"7&&8"0"" 3" " !" 99 452 ,,, " "2 "" ! 23 0 "" "99"99"2 #0""4# 52 # # #""# " "3 #"" -" "" ###"!99"" ##" #""!" 4# 52 " "2 # # !30"0 99 #""# " 3 "299 # #!2#2 #4# 52 "33 0& .
# " !" 0
" #0 ! 4# 52 "0 "
" # ## # 2.!# ! #""! " " " " # 4# 52 # " # 3 # "" ## 7/*"0*" -- . !" !3
0 # ""#. . 3 "" 2# . #""# # "" 33 3 # " 7 /% ". 3" 2 # 0# - .
. 299 3 " . #""" ! "0 # ! #""! ###0 !" #. #""# 0 4# 52 "33 0"2 #& .
# " !2 # ### #""# " . " "" 0 -" !3 " "
" ! # #"" # 3
0 "" # 4# 52 .! # 0 2# !""- # #0 !"#0
2 ! 0" # # "" "" -" 4# 52 !33 "" " # #""!"# . """
"# #02##""#- ## 3 # #0." # 33 0 #""!! # 7/*"0* 7*/ ' #( #